Posted Date : 07th Mar, 2025
Peer-Reviewed Journals List: A Guide to Quality Research Publications ...
Posted Date : 07th Mar, 2025
Choosing the right journal is crucial for successful publication. Cons...
Posted Date : 27th Feb, 2025
Why Peer-Reviewed Journals Matter Quality Control: The peer revie...
Posted Date : 27th Feb, 2025
The Peer Review Process The peer review process typically follows sev...
Posted Date : 27th Feb, 2025
What Are Peer-Reviewed Journals? A peer-reviewed journal is a publica...
Artificial Intelligence in Treatment of HIV: Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications
Author Name : Abhishek Thakur, Almas Khan
ABSTRACT
HIV care is a leading area for development of artificial intelligence (AI), with applications including screening and diagnosis, risk calculation, prognostication and clinical decision-support, management planning, and precision medicine. We review the ethical, legal and social implications of these developments. We consider the values encoded in algorithms, the need to evaluate outcomes, and issues of bias and transferability, data ownership, confidentiality and consent, and legal, moral and professional responsibility. We consider potential effects for patients, including on trust in healthcare, and provide some social science explanations for the apparent rush to implement AI solutions. We conclude by anticipating future directions for AI in HIV care. Stakeholders in healthcare AI should acknowledge that their enterprise is an ethical, legal and social challenge, not just a technical challenge. Taking these challenges seriously will require broad engagement, imposition of conditions on implementation, and pre-emptive systems of oversight to ensure that development does not run ahead of evaluation and deliberation. Once artificial intelligence becomes institutionalized, it may be difficult to reverse: a proactive role for government, regulators and professional groups will help ensure introduction in robust research contexts, and the development of a sound evidence base regarding real-world effectiveness. Detailed public discussion is required to consider what kind of AI is acceptable rather than simply accepting what is offered, thus optimizing outcomes for health systems, professionals, society and those receiving care